FORConn
Friends of Retarded Citizens
of Connecticut

FORConn - Speaking out for Choices for People with Mental Retardation and Their Families!

About Us | Choices | News | Links | You Can Help! | Join Us



FORConn Priorities

FORConn's Top Priority :

FORConn board members  meet around the state with legislators and officials to discuss our priorities, including our top priority: equal pay for equal work! We are all familiar with a problem that has long plagued those who work in the field of mental retardation in Connecticut – the disparity between wages paid in the publicly run facilities and in the private provider facilities. FORConn is dedicated to working towards correcting this problem. There is now looming a financial crisis with the Private Providers that will put our mentally retarded citizens at great risk because these providers can no longer absorb all the costs of running the facilities they have now. Cuts in staff and services and even worst closure of some of these facilities would mean our citizens will be in even more danger.

FORConn is asking the State of Connecticut to provide the funds to eliminate the disparity between wages paid to Department of Mental Retardation (DMR) employees and staff versus lower wages paid to private care providers who are funded by the DMR.
These services may occur in residential or day care facilities, as well as "at home" for folks who receive respite and therapy care through private providers of the DMR.

Although both providers deliver equitable services for persons with mental retardation, the pay the DMR staff receive can be substantially higher. The pay differential causes a drain of resources from the private sector to the public sector and quality of services and care in private facilities can be dramatically affected.

FORConn believes that Connecticut must do what a 1991 Legislative Task Force said should be done --- Establish an equitable system for funding state run and privately run facilities. This issue has been discussed in the General Assembly for many years but no action has been taken to solve the problem.

Our Priorities also include:

  • Laws requiring random Drug Testing of all Direct Care staff (public & private) who work with Department of Mental Retardation clients.
  • Laws requiring National as well as state Criminal Background Checks of all Direct Care staff (public & private) who work with Department of Mental Retardation clients
  • More respite centers and funding to support respite.
  • The establishment of Dental Clinics for persons with mental retardation, and for professional staff to "train at" as part of their professional dental degree. The problems in providing good medical and dental care for our retarded citizens has grown considerably.
  • Supporting issues concerning Health & Aging. The FORConn Health & Aging Committee, established in the spring of 1996, has met regularly with DMR Commissioner Peter H. O'Meara, and David Carlowl, Director of the Division of Health and Clinical Services.
  • Supporting increased funding and considerations in place to take care of the changing needs of older persons with mental retardation. As people age, their medical problems increase and they need more staff attention. Other problems of aging may turn up. Increased funding for the inevitable changes in the needs of persons with mental retardation and should be built into the Department of Mental Retardation budget for those who seek state services and support.
  • Supporting a state plan so that the Department of Mental Retardation is prepared for the large number of elderly persons who will need services soon (especially the unknown number who are now being taken care of by very elderly parents).  We have asked DMR to provide data to us on the number of elderly DMR clients and the number of DMR clients who do not have Guardians (or Advocates).

FORConn's Concerns about Possible Current or Future Connecticut Legislation:

  • The Guardianship Law in CT could possibly be reviewed at any time and changes attempted to be made to it - if you want to get involved in making sure you have appropriate guardianship rights for your child the day they turn 21, and the days that follow....get involved now. Changes in the Guardianship law may take away the rights given to Guardians by the Probate Court. There are persons who work in the field of mental retardation who would like to see your parental and guardianship rights reduced once your child turns 21, whether they live at home, in a community group home, or a larger facility. If you would like to work with FORConn board members to protect parental guardianship rights, join us and protect your guardianship rights now.

Our on Going Review of:

  • A lawsuit to eliminate the waiting list (ARC CT et al v. O'Meara and Wilson-Coker) was filed on October 2, 2001.  The United States District Court has received a Settlement Agreement negotiated by the parties to this class action civil rights lawsuit concerning the "Waiting List" for residential placement, support, and services maintained by the Department of Mental Retardation (DMR), and the administration and operation of the "Home & Community Based Services" waiver, under Title XIX of the Medicaid Act, by the Department of Social Services (DSS) and DMR.  The lawsuit sought on behalf of the class injunctive and declaratory relief requiring the defendants DMR and DSS to provide services and supports responsive to the individual needs of DMR clients listed on the DMR Waiting and Planning Lists.
     
    The Settlement Agreement provides a commitment of state resources, within an average cost of $50,000, which are sufficient to meet the residential placement/support/services needs of 150 individuals on the DMR "Waiting List", who are determined to have the most urgent needs, this year and each year through June 30, 2009.  In addition, the settlement requires enhanced support, not less than an average of $5,000 per individual, to 100 individuals and families each year until June 30, 2009.  The Settlement Agreement also requires the state to apply for a second, more flexible, waiver to meet the needs of class members and to develop policies and procedures concerning the administration of the waivers, including formal hearing processes to contest decisions regarding waiver and waiver service eligibility.  Under the settlement these new policies and procedures must permit application by any person wishing to apply for the HCBS waiver, must require that individual service plans developed under the waiver be based on the needs of the disabled individual, must require that individual services plans be developed by a "team" (consisting of a  DMR Case Manager or broker, an independent broker, as applicable, the individual, family and Circle of Support), must establish an individual budget negotiation process consistent with DMR cost standards and based on individual needs for each HCBS waiver recipient, must require that the DMR client may use negotiated funding to purchase services from an approved provider of his/her choice, and must require that disputes over individual budgets will be resolved through the fair hearing process.
     
  • CT law states that "No mentally incompetent person shall be admitted as an elector". (GSC, Vol. 3, Chapter 143, Electors: Qualifications and Admission, Sec. 9-12). Federal law requires that persons with mental retardation be allowed to register to vote.

FORConn - Working since 1984 For Connecticut Residents
who have Mental Retardation.
Contact Us!